I feel there is something wrong with the way this is described, or at least the way I'm understanding it. Each indication can have multiple syndromes. If an indication has even one syndrome that is unique to that indication, then checking that indication will automatically eliminate all other indications, even if the instance at hand does not have that one unique syndrome.
I can see it working the other way -- you check off syndromes, and as you do the list of possible indications becomes smaller. On Saturday, August 15, 2020 at 3:09:14 AM UTC-7, Vincent vd B wrote: > > Hello, > > Syndrome Differentiation: > To make a diagnosis, look for indications to differentiate between > possible syndromes. > > I have tiddlers who each describe a syndrome. > and tiddlers describing an indication (tagged with the syndromes wich it > is indicating to). > > What I want is some kind of checklist with all indications. (A list of all > tiddlers with the tag: Indication) > If I tick a indication: > All indications that do not refer to that specific syndrome disappear from > the list. And any syndromes common to the selected indication (s) will > appear at the bottom of the tiddler. > > Every time I tick an indication, the possible indications and syndromes > become visible. That makes it easier to research and question. Until I only > have one or a few syndromes left. > > And I need a reset button. > > Basically it is like a kind of database / table where you filter > everything out of the data that has nothing to do with it. > > I am not good at coding and am looking for someone who can help me out. > > Thank you, > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c50f9136-6716-444b-b9b7-844cc94e11f8o%40googlegroups.com.
