David Gifford wrote: > > I guess you will all need to blame me. >
Nah. It was good & opened a lot of useful directions for TW. Power to your elbow & its active greasing. MY point in the OP is that (a) the concepts Roam advances are NOT new; (b) that its approach plays on concepts of linkage that are (i) well worn; (ii) packaged to look innovative; (c) TW can DO all of them and more, no problem (which your Strolling showed). It is not a big deal. I care less they make money from that than *consume informational space*. IMO the underlying issue is that, generally, on web, there is a very poor depiction/explanation of link/tag strategies, Despite their ubiquity & necessity. And that marketing of some non-linear solutions exploits that fact. Better concepts are needed. And *LEAFED* (i.e. the process of grown differentiation from interacting primitives to redolent outcomes) examples in TW would aid that AND help promote TW. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f6bd008a-5403-4fa9-ae3e-5a41f80cb3a4o%40googlegroups.com.
