I think this editor-only version of Streams is pretty awesome! With regards to other threads like this one <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/2yRiVsbAv9g> where people discuss about Tiddlywiki's Zettelkasten abilities and whether each thought/idea should be only one tiddler (with an unique ID), I'm not sure yet if I really need timestamp based tiddlers. What I indeed have needed was a easy way to edit lists in a tiddler. And this is exactly what I was waiting for :) Thanks for your time and efforts!
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:18:18 AM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote: > @Clutterstack I'm not surprised, I hammered this out very quickly with no > regard for error handling or edge cases. I think it illustrates the point > well enough, i.e. making use of in built facilities for manipulating > tiddlers even when the end goal is not to work with tiddler. > > I also think that extending and using the parser is something that is > overlooked in TW. > > Cheers, > Saq > > > On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 12:10:20 AM UTC+2, clutterstack wrote: >> >> Thanks for sharing this interesting hybrid experience, Saq. >> >> A minor hiccup in my test: I managed to break it by accidentally leaving >> an empty bullet ("TypeError: list.children[i].children[0] is undefined"). >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >> On Tuesday, August 18, 2020 at 12:43:12 PM UTC-4, Saq Imtiaz wrote: >>> >>> I am going through a busy period at the moment and don't really have >>> time for discussions, but I wanted to share a demo that may provide >>> inspiration for others working on solutions similar to Streams. >>> >>> Streams was written specifically for the ability to easily create >>> multiple tiddlers with a fast workflow while creating content. However I >>> realize that many people use it just for the fast writing experience for >>> lists, but do not actually want to create multiple tiddlers. Hopefully some >>> of those needs are met by the Editor AutoLists solution that was posted >>> recently. >>> >>> Here is another take on a better writing experience for lists that >>> leverages the advantages of breaking content into tiddlers in TW, but >>> doesn't result in multiple tiddlers in the end. >>> >>> https://saqimtiaz.github.io/sq-tw/single-tiddler-streams.html >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Saq >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/febf316b-c1ab-4a20-9923-6e142fa8dab3n%40googlegroups.com.
