Hi TT,

I'm not sure I follow your thoughts. For example, I have an online 
tiddlywiki for sheet music and since some of the scores are in public 
domain and others not, I separate them and protect the latter with 
htaccess. That way I can still make a tiddler for it and tag it etc. and 
embed the pdf with _canonical_uri and application/pdf, but restrict access 
to myself only.

Similarly, I guess it would be trivial to have a html/php form embedded in 
tiddlywiki from a protected folder that creates "protected tiddlers" in an 
otherwise public tiddlywiki, which at least I think expands the usability 
of tiddlywiki, especially if it becomes possible to load those external 
files at start and treat them as ordinary tiddlers. Just a thought:)

Best,
Anders

mandag 9. november 2020 kl. 18:17:08 UTC+1 skrev TiddlyTweeter:

> Ciao Anjar
>
> ... you can have some content public but also put some content in a 
>> subfolder protected by htaccess and include it in the tiddlywiki. Works 
>> perfectly for pfs etc
>>
>
> Right. Though that is nothing to do with TW, or changes anything you do in 
> it.
>
> The only TW bit I can see is you COULD use the Bob version to 
> create/delete  any needed .htaccess files on-the-fly.
>
> Thoughts
> TT
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/63210bcf-d3fe-411a-86ae-a5eeb587a927n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to