Hi Hans!
But seriously we have such a name.

   1. Electron a famous framework lets create desktop apps using web
   technology https://www.electronjs.org/
   2. Atom is great text editor https://www.electronjs.org/apps/atom
   3. Graviton a minimalistic code editor
   https://www.electronjs.org/apps/graviton-editor


Have a look at https://www.electronjs.org/apps supported by OpenJS and you
find quark.

Just kidding: I prefer Tiddlywiki over atomic related things ;-)

Best wishes
Mohammad


On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 6:50 PM Hans Wobbe <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm probably spending too much time trying to understand Quantum
> computing, so AtomicCards suggests (to me) a possible wish to go a bit
> deeper and at least use subAtomic element names.  Quark? Maybe even Boson
> or Fermion?
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> Hans
>
> On Saturday, January 2, 2021 at 9:14:09 AM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> AtomicCards™
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021, at 2:14 AM, BurningTreeC wrote:
>>
>> I like the name "AtomCards"
>>
>> to add my two cents to the discussion :D
>>
>> [email protected] schrieb am Montag, 28. Dezember 2020 um 07:14:43
>> UTC+1:
>>
>> I couldn't find if this topic has already been re-hashed this decade. But
>> I was wondering if there is any value in discussing alternative names to
>> the "Tiddly" part of the TiddlyWIki project. This project has been around
>> for so long that renaming / rebranding would be quite an effort. And the
>> Tiddly part is unique within programming projects, which helps to eliminate
>> false positives when searching for sample code.
>>
>> I am an American living on the Pacific Coast, so my linguistic
>> preferences are definitely different from Jeremy's. But just saying the
>> word 'Tiddly' out loud feels like trying to get people from certain Germany
>> dialects to say the word "Squirrel." It always feels forced to me.
>>
>> A joke by Lt. Commander Data on Star Trek the Next Generation was about
>> someone mispronouncing 'kidneys' as 'kiddleys.' We the store keeper
>> corrected him, the customer contested, "No, I said 'kiddleys.' Diddle I?"
>>
>> From just a project standpoint, the word 'Tiddly' is trying to focus on
>> the "small amount" of data or code that should be in any one unit. This way
>> many units can be combined in various ways to satisfy different needs.
>> Although it is intended to produce a Wiki-like user interface with deep
>> linking and back references, the way you go about it is by breaking up
>> large pieces of information into re-usable components.
>>
>> If your goal is to create "tiddlers," then using a TiddlyWiki application
>> would be a natural fit. If the goal of most people is to make small units
>> of re-usable components, then perhaps a different prefix would make it more
>> appealing. Again, this is just a personal opinion and not a slight on the
>> TiddlyWiki project as a whole, which I have been using frequently everyday.
>>
>> There have been two alternate words kicking around in my head lately.
>> TipWiki or DotWiki.
>>
>> 'Tip' has a very similar double meaning to Tiddly - drunk people can be
>> 'tiddly' or 'tipsy', and just the 'tip' of something or a 'tiddly' amount
>> of something is quite small. There is an additional English meaning of
>> 'tip' to mean 'a small note or suggestion.' That seems to be actually the
>> point of TiddlyWiki: Make lots of small notes that can be re-combined as
>> pieces of many different larger pages. 'Tiddlers' would become 'Tips', and
>> a single 'tiddler' would become a single 'tip.' Phonetically, it feels a
>> lot easier to talk about.
>>
>> 'Dot' has an inherent meaning of 'smallest possible mark or amount.' This
>> would again drive home the concept of making the smallest possible content
>> for any one unit of information. Unfortunately, dots are already associated
>> with the 'dot notation' of Object Oriented Programming, so that could make
>> it a little confusing as to the overall goal for people with software
>> development backgrounds.
>>
>> The goal of renaming the project would be to push the desire for
>> "smallness" of the individual unit using a more standard English word.
>> Please forgive me if I am pushing anyone's buttons here. This topic was
>> just on my mind. Thank you for your time.
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tiddlywiki/ZVHqfQWr2uM/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b072f8ff-973a-4349-bcff-8e9d10fcebfen%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b072f8ff-973a-4349-bcff-8e9d10fcebfen%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f443d286-2e4d-4a93-afa9-71268d4dbacfn%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f443d286-2e4d-4a93-afa9-71268d4dbacfn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAAV1gMBJtdPueMZKqfwWace%2B_6eosLvvhY_32ZFpH4tKS7Bd5g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to