*TiddlyTweeter wrote:*
> *Charlie ...* > * "card" turns me off for some weird reason (gets me semantically > glitching?). * > > *Right. Me too. Card / record has an implying very bound up with database > histories. I actually think the TW "fragment" is actually NOT that. It is > quite distant form such "pre-structuring" concepts.* > Repeat my "dammit-bravo" below. I view tiddlers as either "fragment tiddlers" or "fragment aggregation tiddlers." I just can't let go of the word "tiddler", both because of my semantic attachment to the word and, I can't help it: the word makes me smile 'cause it is so cute (cue my version of "it's so fluffy!" from "Despicable Me".) > > *Of course one COULD USE TW as a "card-base" / "data-base". And that is a > perfectly valid Application of it. But I don't think it is intrinsically > that way at all.* > Dammit, that's exactly what I think, but just could not figure out how to say it. That strikes a major chord with me. Bravo ! > > *MY interest in TW stems from interest in "realizable semantics". What I > mean is a tool that lets different ways of depicting and structuring > knowledge/experience emerge incrementally.* > Ditto! All in the spirit of Knowledge Componentization <https://blog.okfn.org/2007/04/30/what-do-we-mean-by-componentization-for-knowledge/> (I'm a big fan of that article.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3e85b918-e9ce-422a-a384-826faeb45cc3n%40googlegroups.com.
