On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 6:47:30 PM UTC+1 Mark S. wrote: > What does "relationship" bring to the table? How would it be useful? Are > there some examples?
At the moment we use tags and fields to define connections between tiddlers. It would also be possible to define some of this info within a link. eg: If you have [[Jack]], [[Joe]], [[Jill]] and [[Jane]] you may know they are persons because we have names here. But you don't know more ... Let's say the tiddler named: Jack contains title: Jack [? stepson[Joe]], [? daughter[Jill]] and [? wife[Jane]] Now we know a lot more, without the need to visit any of the other tiddlers. ... It's a patchwork family. It feels like an unnecessary complexity, but maybe I'm missing something > really neat. > With the right code the info above can be extracted, to eg create a family tree. .. The advantage is, that no fields or tags are used. The tree can grow organically while the content is entered. eg: Joe may link to [? father[Stephen]] ... and so on. .. That's only 1 example. The initial example in the OP was [? mention[mr A]] and [? participant[mr J]] [? participant[mr K]] The problem is: TW core doesn't support such information at the moment. ... BUT it's interesting to think about it. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5833ec6d-a3b6-4168-8371-5cabbf659c45n%40googlegroups.com.
