On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 2:18 PM TiddlyTweeter <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Mohammad wrote:
>
>> Yes, you are tight! There are 132 css selectors! ...
>>
> ... there are still too many selectors and no grouping! I think this is
>> not a good design practice.
>>
>
> RIGHT. The issue arose, I think, (1) partly from legacy; (2) partly
> recognition of the power of CSS.
>
> *In reality, TW has SO MANY METHODS of applying CSS it is really daunting
> (here are SOME of them
> <https://tiddlywiki.com/#How%20to%20apply%20custom%20styles> , there are
> MORE available through WikiText) .*
>
> *The palette selectors reflect the complexity of TW's CSS in general I
> think! *
>
> FYI, the only developer I know who attempted to look at the whole CSS
> issue from "*Ground Zero*" was Telmiger in his BRICKS plugin.
>

I have seen it before! but I will have close look again!

ّ‌

>
> TW Vanilla, I think, is a really good CSS design, but too complex for EASY
> logical modification.
>

Let me disagree! I think it is very difficult to maintain Vanilla CSS! It
can have a much better design!


> My 2 Cents :-)
> TT
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e136335d-d012-4c06-a423-31f109e1ca88n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e136335d-d012-4c06-a423-31f109e1ca88n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAAV1gMCLL0zwMqdzCxX4%3Dr6m8Td%3DReTc4V4O_GcDTPFx0bGsxQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to