That's true! Best wishes Mohammad
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 2:55 PM TiddlyTweeter <[email protected]> wrote: > TiddlyTweeter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> TW Vanilla, I think, is a really good CSS design, but too complex for >>> EASY logical modification. >>> >> > Mohammad wrote: > >> Let me disagree! I think it is very difficult to maintain Vanilla CSS! It >> can have a much better design! >> > > We are likely *BOTH *right! In different ways. > > I think Vanilla works *well *out-of-the-box. > > In actual CSS re-design developers, most of them, do a* "CSS cascade > overlay" *BECAUSE* zeroing out Vanilla is a real challenge that few > have attempted.* > > But we CAN zero-out Vanilla. But we CAN'T zero-out the *zillions *of > classes that will still need defining. > > My 2 Cents > TT > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3f39f9e8-1b0d-494e-92d3-b494bb4fe3e2n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3f39f9e8-1b0d-494e-92d3-b494bb4fe3e2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAAV1gMDUfMBa-dxAzOWPg4uixHWb2%3DPafqz9jUq5-V5n0cANVQ%40mail.gmail.com.
