Out of nearly 300 entries, less than 1% had url errors. I was hoping to do follow-ups with the w3c link validator, but it doesn't recognize the site as a document. The standard link-checker software said everything was ok, but obviously that's wrong.
I've removed the entry with a bad url. I will stop working for now. It's VERY tedious condensing descriptions to 10 words and supplying tags. Mistakes are bound to happen. The last thing I need is to find people upset with my work. If requested, I can roll back existing entrees. On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 6:25:32 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > There should also be a tag to indicate "highest supported version" or > something similar if relevant (for plugins, for example) and its known. > > On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 8:09:59 PM UTC-5 David Gifford wrote: > >> There should be a way to report dead links. LibreNote, for example, turns >> up a 404. Someone is adding links without even checking them first. >> >> Also, giffmex.org has been https:// since early 2020. If those adding >> links to giffmex.org could convert them from http: to https:, that would >> be appreciated. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/02dd9f80-b088-44d4-ae1b-c07f8d253130n%40googlegroups.com.
