I've gone through and removed or disambiguated  duplicates except for these 
older pages where it's not possible to permalink (AFAIK) :

http://tiddlystuff.tiddlyspot.com/ 3 <#3>  
http://skplugins.tiddlyspot.com/ 4 <#4>  
http://tw5magick.tiddlyspot.com/ 5 <#5>  



On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 7:29:46 AM UTC-7 Mark S. wrote:

> Note that some links that have the same landing page actually have 
> different descriptions and Tags. This is usually because the page was made 
> before permalinks were available.
>
> Older TW's didn't have the permalink button, but did they still have 
> permalinks? Is their some backward compatible code that could generate them?
>
> Is there a handy filter that would detect duplicate url's without nesting?
>
> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 6:53:20 AM UTC-7 [email protected] 
> wrote:
>
>> One thing I’m noticing is that you have multiple $:/tags/Link entries 
>> pointing to the same URL. It doesn’t break the system or anything, but 
>> perhaps it would make more sense for the scraper to merge multiple entries 
>> with the same URL from the same contributor. We would merge the tags, and 
>> concatenate the descriptions. Alternately, I could make you a script that 
>> you could paste into the JS console to do that merging on your original 
>> bookmarks.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> On 24 Mar 2021, at 13:40, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Saq's page is very nice, but he didn't extract the url or apply tags, so 
>> it's actually harder to use than the source MD.
>>
>> My methodology. I use an advanced text editor and split the original text 
>> into fields with pipes. 
>> I paste the text into an "incoming" tiddler.
>> I've written a tiddler that will split the incoming items, apply 
>> specified tags, populate the url field, and add a unique identifier to 
>> avoid tiddler name collisions.
>> Then I use a dashboard tiddler to browse the new entries. This makes it 
>> easier to browse the new entries, change tags, long text, and url. I can 
>> also click on a link to check if the link is working. Often I would tweak 
>> the link to use the exact permalink. Tiddlers can then be approved or 
>> marked as a problem.
>>
>> This is done in batches by sub-topics to help reduce errors. Rinse. 
>> Repeat.
>>
>> Of the various steps, it is checking the link that is slowest -- having 
>> to look back and forth, and often authors "hide" the bit you want.  I 
>> checked each link for the first 218 submissions. After that I decided to 
>> mark items for review and come back and double-check links later, like when 
>> I was really bored. Of the next 50 I added, ONE had a missing url problem. 
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 3:19:19 AM UTC-7 Mohammad wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 1:34 PM Saq Imtiaz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Birthe and @Mohammad:
>>>>
>>>> This is the same content but should be a lot less resource intensive to 
>>>> work with:
>>>> https://saqimtiaz.github.io/sq-tw/streams-tiddlytoolmap2.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Saq! This is much suitable to create the entries for TW link 
>>> aggregator.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 8:24:06 AM UTC+1 [email protected] 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mohammad,
>>>>> Is this the link? 
>>>>> https://saqimtiaz.github.io/sq-tw/streams-tiddlytoolmap.html I do not 
>>>>> remember the link, but I think Mark S did something similar testing 
>>>>> notowritey.
>>>>>
>>>>> Birthe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> onsdag den 24. marts 2021 kl. 06.05.51 UTC+1 skrev Mohammad:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>>>  I really appreciate your efforts! I think you should develop a small 
>>>>>> code to do the conversion from Toolmap to link aggregator! I know Saq 
>>>>>> converted Toolmaps entry to TW tiddlers sometimes ago, but I forgot the 
>>>>>> link to that Tiddlywiki!
>>>>>>  I know this work is tedious and like you I think the current 
>>>>>> configuration is not the best! Like you I think Jeremy shall remove the 
>>>>>> restriction on description, ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>> Mohammad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 9:03 AM 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Out of nearly 300 entries, less than 1% had url errors. I was hoping 
>>>>>>> to do follow-ups with the w3c link validator, but it doesn't recognize 
>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>> site as a document. The standard link-checker software said everything 
>>>>>>> was 
>>>>>>> ok, but obviously that's wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've removed the entry with a bad url.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will stop working for now. It's VERY tedious condensing 
>>>>>>> descriptions to 10 words and supplying tags. Mistakes are bound to 
>>>>>>> happen. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The last thing I need is to find people upset with my work. If 
>>>>>>> requested, I can roll back existing entrees.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 6:25:32 PM UTC-7 [email protected] 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There should also be a tag to indicate "highest supported version" 
>>>>>>>> or something similar if relevant (for plugins, for example) and its 
>>>>>>>> known. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 8:09:59 PM UTC-5 David Gifford wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There should be a way to report dead links. LibreNote, for 
>>>>>>>>> example, turns up a 404. Someone is adding links without even 
>>>>>>>>> checking them 
>>>>>>>>> first.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, giffmex.org has been https:// since early 2020. If those 
>>>>>>>>> adding links to giffmex.org could convert them from http: to 
>>>>>>>>> https:, that would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/02dd9f80-b088-44d4-ae1b-c07f8d253130n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/02dd9f80-b088-44d4-ae1b-c07f8d253130n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/556e327f-0f2f-4636-8a78-3cc27d86040cn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/556e327f-0f2f-4636-8a78-3cc27d86040cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2a094dd7-1d08-44cc-bb7d-5a74a687199en%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2a094dd7-1d08-44cc-bb7d-5a74a687199en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1443feec-634b-481d-a15c-895cc8f39ea8n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to