I don't know if they are loving that or not. The commas aren't easy to see between brackets (for me). If I begin on end of filter run, i also have this problem. But any can build his/her mental shorcuts to avoid it. If someone can't solve a problem, maybe he/she can create a "alternative way"
Yes, I tried with the tagging operator and I see that behaviour. El viernes, 24 de septiembre de 2021 a las 18:52:36 UTC+2, [email protected] escribió: > I was thinking that the tagging operator was the zay to get tiddlers that > all share all of the tags in input. That's what the dec say: "output: the > titles of any tiddlers that carry the input tags". > > So my function would be: > > \define fun(tags) > <$vars four="[tags[]count[]match[4]]"> > <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags$]tagging[] :filter<four>]">Seen <<occ>> > tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set> > </$vars> > \end > > But in fact the effect of tagging is "output: the titles of any tiddlers > that carry ANY OF the input tags". Too bad for the instance. But I think a > correction in the doc would be welcome. > > > Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 10:59:50 UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Rivière a > écrit : > >> That's fine by me. >> >> And yes filters are fun even if sometimes a bit tricky. >> >> So for the fun of it, you could arrange your filter so that the input >> would be the 4 tags you want. >> >> something like that: >> >> \define fun(tags) >> <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags]....put your filter code >> here...count[]]">Seen <<occ>> tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set> >> \end >> >> Sometimes, this fun has you coding javascript filter operator. Would this >> be the case here? I have not thought about it yet. >> >> cheers, >> >> >> Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 03:54:34 UTC+2, [email protected] a >> écrit : >> >>> Me and my interest in brain age games, I couldn't help but play around >>> with a filter to find all tiddlers that have all four specified tags, but >>> only those four tags. >>> >>> You'll find three tiddlers in the attached json. Download the file, and >>> drag into some TiddlyWiki instance (TiddlyWiki.com !) to take a gander. >>> >>> There are all kinds of ways to go about doing this sort of thing, with >>> some filter operators maybe better suited, but I find the result a bit >>> easier for me to understand (more logical to me, or maybe more >>> self-explanatory, because of the way my brain works, I suppose.) Maybe >>> just a difference between top-down view vs bottom-up view or something ... >>> >>> Yeah, I find filters fun. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a7516220-72de-484d-adaf-b36aacd29c3cn%40googlegroups.com.
