Oh man, that is pretty awesome. I can see the majority of the folk loving
that.
But you're right, for my disability, that isn't explicit enough for me to
distinguish what's going on.
Too many ways of specifying individual tags, and I start getting into some
cognitive overload. I'm the same way when facing a Chinese food buffet,
always holding up the line because of too many choices.
Regardless, that is pretty awesome for normal folk who can bounce between
the different ways the tag operator can be used.
On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 12:39:53 PM UTC-3 Álvaro wrote:
> It works fine. I tried to find a alternative, but I wasn't lucky.
>
> When I resee your filter, I remember about the multiple parameters in
> filter operator with commas (from last version, 5.1.23). And we can add a
> second filter run that it applies your filter to result of first run. Then
> you can rewrite your filter something like this (in filtering transclusion)
> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>
> Although maybe it be less understandble for you.
>
>
> El viernes, 24 de septiembre de 2021 a las 10:59:50 UTC+2,
> [email protected] escribió:
>
>> That's fine by me.
>>
>> And yes filters are fun even if sometimes a bit tricky.
>>
>> So for the fun of it, you could arrange your filter so that the input
>> would be the 4 tags you want.
>>
>> something like that:
>>
>> \define fun(tags)
>> <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags]....put your filter code
>> here...count[]]">Seen <<occ>> tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set>
>> \end
>>
>> Sometimes, this fun has you coding javascript filter operator. Would this
>> be the case here? I have not thought about it yet.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>>
>> Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 03:54:34 UTC+2, [email protected] a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Me and my interest in brain age games, I couldn't help but play around
>>> with a filter to find all tiddlers that have all four specified tags, but
>>> only those four tags.
>>>
>>> You'll find three tiddlers in the attached json. Download the file, and
>>> drag into some TiddlyWiki instance (TiddlyWiki.com !) to take a gander.
>>>
>>> There are all kinds of ways to go about doing this sort of thing, with
>>> some filter operators maybe better suited, but I find the result a bit
>>> easier for me to understand (more logical to me, or maybe more
>>> self-explanatory, because of the way my brain works, I suppose.) Maybe
>>> just a difference between top-down view vs bottom-up view or something ...
>>>
>>> Yeah, I find filters fun.
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0ce46048-5cfe-4fb3-b5b9-3d5367fcd007n%40googlegroups.com.
