That's fine by me. And yes filters are fun even if sometimes a bit tricky.
So for the fun of it, you could arrange your filter so that the input would be the 4 tags you want. something like that: \define fun(tags) <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags]....put your filter code here...count[]]">Seen <<occ>> tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set> \end Sometimes, this fun has you coding javascript filter operator. Would this be the case here? I have not thought about it yet. cheers, Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 03:54:34 UTC+2, cj.v...@gmail.com a écrit : > Me and my interest in brain age games, I couldn't help but play around > with a filter to find all tiddlers that have all four specified tags, but > only those four tags. > > You'll find three tiddlers in the attached json. Download the file, and > drag into some TiddlyWiki instance (TiddlyWiki.com !) to take a gander. > > There are all kinds of ways to go about doing this sort of thing, with > some filter operators maybe better suited, but I find the result a bit > easier for me to understand (more logical to me, or maybe more > self-explanatory, because of the way my brain works, I suppose.) Maybe > just a difference between top-down view vs bottom-up view or something ... > > Yeah, I find filters fun. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/097b783f-52c6-42f7-b0b5-9ed35c9198den%40googlegroups.com.
