> > What does "nicely designed" mean? I may find something wonderfully > designed, while 99% of normal folk find the same thing awful. >
So I'm talking about appealing to the 99%. If we look at, say, the "clothes design industry" we should realize how incredibly narrow our tastes are if we consider that clothes really could be designed in unlimited number of ways. Most of us have similar preferences about most things. (Of course, you and I have our own distinguished tastes and free minds... and that very belief is another thing we have in common with almost all other people.) [...], and who cares whether it looks abandoned or not? > Before people become full tiddlywikians, then need to decide if they want to try out TW to begin with. At that stage, impressions and feelings matter a lot. Things that look abandoned or outdated are generally less appealing than things that look up to date and alive. I'm pretty sure people are more interested in a software where it says "October 19, 2021" instead of , say, "May 7, 2018". [...] the best thing is to continously/regularly update it. > Of course, but that means responsibility and effort... > An alternative/complimentary approach might involve having the wiki acting > a bit like a portal, showing some dynamic content from somewhere else so it > looks like the TiddlyWiki has a pulse ? > Yes, that is a good idea. Any good examples of how this can be done? <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4dbb2d41-dd54-4903-8532-959ca5364247n%40googlegroups.com.
