Matias.... So, here's what I've neglectd putting into words lately
1) I think you're doing a great job! We're getting there, for sure. Although maybe quiet, don't think people (like me) are not being involved. 2) I like the way you've discovered how to split up things ...and - although the current "comunity" space today is far from being usable - this is clearly going in the right direction! I would even strip any additional info and leave that in the TiddlyWorld space as a kind of reminder of where the road might eventually lead to. 3) Topmost priority for me is to identify the most wanted community features and list them in the communitydev space. I am not sure how we're going to vote on these things... maybe for a lack of a better alternative, let's just put our usrenames behind every proposition, use google forms or micropoll.com and have people sign up for voting... or simply use this group to discuss individual ideas... I think we're really good at that. Anyways, having a list like that surely would give an indication of what are the most desirable features. 4) As for community-supply... if anything, I think it really should only contain the plugins being used by the community space, this is wher€e components are being loaded into. On the other hand, maybe we really need a very basic 'admin-theme' space to be included ...allowing us to create a public tiddler - like plugins - without requiring the system-theme space(s). 5) I think we would do good with a "community-sandbox". Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to clutter the spaces list with yet another... but whenever some new feature or plugin is being explored in the community context ...it should be tested in the sandbox ...which, of course, (re-)includes the community space, whenever a new thing is being tested ...everything still in test-mode should therefore be tagged 'keep' or otherwise is prone to being deleted in an attempt to test, well, something else. 6) As for collaboration, you may have noticed the TypeWithMe integration I have created ...now being available in the semantic space. I really am not sure if this is very fruitful... so, what would you think of this... does it make sense to use this as a (complemantary) discussion/annotation tool? 7) Haven't gotten around making an updated version for the poup(macro) space yet. Well, above all, enjoy your weekend! Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
