On Nov 11, 11:21 pm, colmjude <[email protected]> wrote: > I know that some people prefer to use fields when they hold data that > can be considered secondary or meta data about the main content of the > tiddler. And they use tags when the tags add contextual data to the > content. This is probably an approach I prefer too. If the data will > add something useful for the reader then I'll use a tag where as if it > is something that is used used by the computer/system then i'll use a > field for that. > > It's a thinker and don't think there is a definite right or wrong > really. > > Colm I think this is a very intuitive approach and very reasonable. However TW (unfortunately) uses tags for system things like "systemConfig". And users use tags to attach extra metadata.
I think it would be interesting to see if it is possible to have TW support tiddler "properties" for computer things like systemConfig and excludeSearch, and tags for user input en d metadata. However that would require a change in the TW core. Vlak -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
