you could just make your own tags field and use that, leaving the TW's native tags to do TW specific roles...?
ALex On 12 November 2010 14:22, tiddlygrp <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 11, 11:21 pm, colmjude <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know that some people prefer to use fields when they hold data that > > can be considered secondary or meta data about the main content of the > > tiddler. And they use tags when the tags add contextual data to the > > content. This is probably an approach I prefer too. If the data will > > add something useful for the reader then I'll use a tag where as if it > > is something that is used used by the computer/system then i'll use a > > field for that. > > > > It's a thinker and don't think there is a definite right or wrong > > really. > > > > Colm > I think this is a very intuitive approach and very reasonable. > However TW (unfortunately) uses tags for system things like > "systemConfig". And users use tags to attach extra metadata. > > I think it would be interesting to see if it is possible to have TW > support tiddler "properties" for computer things like systemConfig and > excludeSearch, and tags for user input en d metadata. However that > would require a change in the TW core. > > Vlak > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<tiddlywiki%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
