Hi Jeremy

keeping the main docs on tiddlywiki.com is great.

I was also concerned with the documentation for and surrounding
tiddlywiki.

Vlak

On Nov 29, 1:41 pm, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]> wrote:
> My goal is to get authoritative reference documentation built into
> tiddlywiki.com, so that all the key information is easy to pick up and
> take with you when working offline.
>
> The plan is to feed it from the reference information that we're
> assembling over on tiddlyspace.
>
> When the documentation on tiddlyspace is mature and useful enough, I'd
> be hoping to switch tiddlywiki.org over to it. (We do have to make
> some improvements before that's possible, like better interactions
> with Googlebot).
>
> Cheers
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> > Tiddlywiki.org is easy enough about tiddlywiki, so I know it applies.
> > When I look through tiddlyspace I usually get something like: "just
> > include this space".  For me that implies I have to try to import the
> > tiddlers of this space in a tiddlywiki to see if it works.  And often
> > it does not, which is to be expected.
>
> > Paul wrote:
> >> Another issue is that we've had difficulty separating "developer"
> >> documentation from "end user" documentation. My personal view is
> >> that the distinction of roles isn't always useful, but I realise
> >> others
> >> think it's essential.
>
> >> My own personal prejudice is that reference documentation about
> >> code maintained separately from code is always out of date, so
> >> I'd push for authors of plugins to document in the plugin tiddler, or
> >> in an associated "info" tiddler, and maybe we could look again at
> >> generating docs from the core code, though that's something of
> >> a hardy perennial.
>
> > For me the distinction between end user and developer is very fluent.
> > I consider myself an end user, but I have no problem reading the
> > plugin code or using a little js.  I think just mixing all
> > documentation and tagging it with levels like:  easy - requires js
> > knowledge - requires html coding etc. would be fine.
>
> > Vlak
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "TiddlyWiki" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
>
> --
> Jeremy Ruston
> mailto:[email protected]://www.tiddlywiki.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.

Reply via email to