> Outstanding work!! Congratulations. > Great job. I really like your results ... Måns thx. I'll take some of the flowers :) But the FancyBoxPlugin is just a wrapper for the library/functions provieded by fancybox.net [1]. I tried to implement a TW macro interface, that creates "easy" access to all the library functions, without the need of programming. FBP uses sections and slices and converts them into something, that jQuery().fancybox() can handle. And I wanted to have something, that can access tiddler names by tag and convert them into a slideshow.
>.. - especially the nice animation of a > FancyBox'ed image fading back to the last viewed image in the Tiddler. > That's downright beautiful! :-) Yes it is. This is a feature of the library. > I only miss one thing, (don't know if Fancybox has this feature at all...) > that's an automatic slideshow mode, where you can set time (i.e 6sec) either > to all at once or time to show one image untill it will show next image?!? I didn't find a usefull answere to this question. But I can think about using a "special" title, with some javascript, that could handle it. Similar to AdvancedTitles_1/2. > I've looked at the [[FancyBox named params]] tiddler and I was wondering if > you'd bother to create a few extra examples on how to use different content > types: ajax, inline and iframe as well? :) I didn't delete that tiddler, because it should remind me, that there are things missing. I have to say, I did't even test these library functions :). see the PS section about this. > I do understand that you are quite content with status quo - it's very good > as it is now. It's AWESOME to have a COOL lightboxPlugin for TiddlyWiki, > which even takes advantage of AttachFilePlugin's fallbackmechanism for > images - that's extra extra cool!! :-) I think, the way, how Eric handles, files by reference, is very sophisticated. Especially, it doesn't blow up the TW file size. > Thanks for sharing it!! you are welcome. ==== What's about the picture titles? Do you use the tiddler title, or something different. I really need feedback about this? -mario PS: I have to say that I personally don't like iframing. I think unasked iframing the whole site is like stealing content. I think writing a short summary of something and make a propper link to it, honors the original writer. Iframing a site doesn't. But this is my personal opinion. [1] http://fancybox.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
