On Mar 18, 9:24 am, rakugo <[email protected]> wrote: > If there are some issues with the implementation a thread should of > course be started straight away in TiddlyWikiDev to resolve these. It > is only an alpha version after all. +1
> In terms of how TiddlyWiki development works, as far as I'm concerned > I raised a ticket for this *3 months* ago on > trac:http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/ticket/1286 I personally don't look a the track system. May be, because I can't use it's interface. And there are allready enough places to listen to. I followed Mans thread about "templating". > This sounds like a process issue that we need to iron out. > > Personally I would like to see more tests in TiddlyWiki and more > activity on TiddlyWiki tickets driving development - the ticket should > be the single thing that drives development in this project. > Jon May be. But I found out, that creating a ticket, on TiddlySpace github, is not that effective than posting something to TW-dev group, or TiddlyWeb, TiddlyWiki group. First off all, for me, the psychological barrier, posting to a ticket system, is much much higher, than posting to a user group. And since there is no official statement, that the ticket system is the _only_ way, to get things done, I'll use the easy way first. Second. I simply couldn't figure out, how to write valid tickets, yet. Valid for me means, that something happens, similar to a way I ment it. In my feelings, some tickets where closed, due to impropper formulation. Which for sure was true but this won't/can't happen in a discussion group. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
