I think adding the class "list" and the class "<list-type>" would make sense like you suggest. So for the filter list, "list" and "list-filter" would be added as classes The list- prefix is probably necessary to avoid any css problems with existing classes such as "filter" or "all". With these and parseParams you should be able to do anything in javascript / css that you would like to do.
On Mar 22, 9:04 am, PMario <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 18, 11:10 am, rakugo <[email protected]> wrote:> Oh and in answer to > your original question, it seems that the list > > macro could benefit from a refresh mechanism. This would mean the > > entire parameter string would be accessible via a params attribute and > > would also update when tiddlers change (you could thus do > > paramString.parseParams). > > Yes, I think, this would be a nice to have. > > But it wouldn't solve any of the CSS styling requests, since propper > styling should be done with "class=" and/or "id=" attributes. > > Some more thoughts out there? > -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
