+1 Dani. IMHO an excellent post. > *Tags, in the traditional form [...] you have all your tags at one big pile.
Yes - being able to put your tags into a hierarchical structure would be wonderful. Regards the number of levels, you mention that 2-3 might be enough. I generally head towards allowing for 7 levels when developing solutions for such challenges. Not just my idea! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ The_Magical_Number_Seven,_Plus_or_Minus_Two) And i totally agree Dani, missing from many a good CMS is the ability to filter a hierarchical data structure. Sure, there is filtering implicit within the concept of hierarchy. When you expand a node, you see only the child content of that node. Many a developer rubs their hands together with glee as they point proudly at their masterpiece. However, what if you don't want to see all children? Perhaps you only want to focus on some of the children. Imagine being able to browse your hierarchical data structure with it filtered according to some of the tags you selected from your neatly organised hierarchical structure of tags. Then, when you go to add a piece of content, it automatically gets tagged with all tags associated with the filter that you have in place, as well as obviously being set as the direct descendent to the node that you had selected at the time. I hope some of you understand my ramblings. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
