Richard Niolon wrote:
I can only add a small amount to this discussion.
1) Tiddlywiki is in my mind the best software I've ever used. Thanks
Eric and Jeremy!
2) Tiddlywiki and google groups is great for the geeky amongst us...
but there are a whole lot of non-geeky people out there.
Aye, there's the rub.
There's a whole lot of non-geeky people who won't use a tiddlywiki
because it doesn't seem user friendly.
Well... it's also not all that developer friendly. And THAT's the rub.
We just went through a technology evaluation process for building a
single-page application.
Now I really like Tiddly (except it's basic interface - for what we're
doing outline format, with click to expand/contract sections/subsections
would be a lot more useful) - but I sure as heck can't figure out how
all the pieces fit together to write a different UI on top of the common
internals.
And... pretty much everybody else on my team takes one look at Tiddly
and throws up their hands.
I expect we're going to go off and write our own framework for
single-page applications - because it sure looks a lot easier than
buliding on Tiddly. That's sort of a shame.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In<fnord> practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
