Don't know if this is related at all - sorry if I'm offtopic however I wonder why the creatorfield never made it into the core?
http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/ticket/471 http://www.tiddlytools.com/#CoreTweaks "471 'creator' field for new tiddlers" I'm using it on TS: http://d-minus.tiddlyspace.com/ - and being able to distinguish between an original author and who made the last edit/ modification seems very essential... (imho) Cheers Måns Mårtensson On 14 Nov., 22:59, [email protected] wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, tiddlygrp wrote: > > @Jeremy: For me a tiddler uuid has nothing directly to do with a > > tiddler. At creation time put a uuid in a field in the tiddler is the > > absolute minimum I think tw should do. A lot other stuff can be done > > server side. The advantage of creating a uuid at tiddler creation > > time is that then it is "uniquely" marked. Then the tiddler might > > move to a server (or not). My thought is that by putting the uuid in > > tw, all servers should support this standard. If each server builds > > up its own uuid semantics, than its hard to get federation and sharing > > of tiddlers peer to peer without a server. > > Yes, agree with all this. If any tiddlers are gonna have uuids it is > far better if _all_ tiddlers have them. > > > And probably the uri/url's to get a tiddler will be server dependent. > > That is not a problem. The problem to be solved it what do you get > > back when you call GET /some.tiddler.json? Which fields are in the > > tiddler and what do they mean? > > Okay that makes more sense. I'm not sure how or who to decide the > syntax and semantics. > > -- > Chris Dent http://burningchrome.com/ > [...] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
