I entirely agree with cdent here (surprise!), and his explanations don't leave much else for me to say.
> I would argue that also a standard TiddlyWiki is dished out via some > server, hence serving tiddlers in a predefined way. I don't understand the meaning of this. Are you simply saying there has to be a common format for tiddlers - we already have that, though it's extensible of course (I doubt anyone thinks that's a bad thing). > In other words, while of course one would expect there to be some > client for editing tiddlers, it always is a server that delivers these > uuid's, since they are stored in tiddlers and thus delivered in > whatever serialization or representation is being used. This primacy of servers seems like the wrong approach. The point of UUIDs is that anyone can generate them. There doesn't even have to be a server involved (think exchanging tiddlers via e-mail, thumb drives or numbers stations). > Consider this scenario: [...] Unfortunately, I can't make too much sense of this either right now. -- F. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
