Well, you can do it with MatchTagsPlugin (1), NestedSlidersPlugin (2)
and DOMTweaksPlugin (3). And I think there are some other options as
well.
Here are a couple of examples:
Example 1 with (1) and (3): Get all tiddlers taged tag1 and ta2 but
not tag3 and display them on panels:
<<matchTags {{"+++*[%0]#panelName:...<<tiddler [[%0]]>\>==="}} "|"
tag1 AND tag2 AND NOT tag3>>
<<matchTags {{"<<DOM move panelName>\>"}} " "tag1 AND tag2 AND NOT
tag3>>
The panelName is a code word defining the name of the DOM object,
which is manipulated. The tags at the end can be a single tag or
multiple, and you can use Boolean operators, like in the example. So
you could have tiddlers titled Choice1, Choice2... ChoiceN, which
would contain similar code for subchoice tiddlers, say, Choice2a,
Choice2b... Choice2n.
Example 2 with (2) and (3): Basically your example; they're not proper
tab, but I'm sure that with some CSS magic, you could make them look
like tags.
+++*[Choice A]#ChoiceA:
Choice A, blah blah!
=== | +++*[Choice B]#ChoiceB:
Choice B, unlike Choice A, comes in two variants:
+++*[Choice B1]#ChoiceB1:
Choice B1, blah blah!
=== | +++*[Choice B2]#ChoiceB2:
Choice B2, blah blah!
===
<<DOM move ChoiceB1>><<DOM move ChoiceB2>>
=== | +++*[Choice C]#ChoiceC:
Choice C, blah blah!
===
<<DOM move ChoiceA>><<DOM move ChoiceB>><<DOM move ChoiceC>>
The only issue here is that for some reason, panels ChoiceB1 and
ChoiceB2 aren't transient and you can have them both open at the same
time, which is not what you want, I'm guessing. I tested this without
the DOM panels and the behavior of the level 2 panels was the same,
they were not transient. Does anyone know why this is so?
Hope it helps.
w
(1) http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#MatchTagsPlugin
(2) http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#NestedSlidersPlugin
(3) http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#DOMTweaksPlugin
On Apr 13, 2:01 pm, wolfgang <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know it's possible to do something *similar* by using the standard tabs
> macro and giving it references to sections of the current tiddler, but
> among other problems, you can't really nest content that way.
> Are you're looking for an easier syntax? Because you seem aware that nested
> tabs are possible today already.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
