Addendum, As for semantics, somewhat relevant may be... http://semantic.tiddlyspace.com
Also, there could at some point be a UI that allows to define a "semantic tag" by chosing the tag target from a given set, e.g. by TW knowing that potential "parents" are [[John]] and [[Jane]] and then offering them first for tagging in terms of a "child of" tagging relation... all other tiddlers being listed subsequently. For example, if the semantic qualifier [[parent]] were a tiddler and all members of it would tag to it, then it would be easy for TW to figure out the existing options, e.g. * semantic qualifier = [[parent]] * [[Jane]], [[John]] <tag to> [[parent]] I want to define the a semantic tag for [[Billy]] in terms of assigning both [[Jane]](parent) [[John]](parent). Eventually [[Jane]] could also tag to a generic [[mother]] and John to a generic [[father]] if one wanted so and then assign Billy as follows: * [[Billy]] <tagged> [[Jane]](mother) [[John]](father) There could even fancy stuff like custom css, e.g. color coding for a given semantic qualifier, e.g. male blue and femal pink, as we all know. ^_^ Cheers, Tobias. On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 03:55:59 UTC+2, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > > Finally, I wonder if there is any work under-way on tag semantics - so > that creating a tag of 'Fred Bloggs' can have semantics of 'Work Colleague' > associated with it when tagging say 'Jane Right'. So it is creating > n-triples (sort of) similar to N3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notation3 ? > > This is an idea I am sure I have been trying to communicate a while back, > too. > > Semantically it is quite relevant to be a able to qualify a tag (not just > in terms of polymorphism). It's a bit like a "compound tag", one that is > actually two or more, yet somehow TW would know that the parts are semantic > entities by themselves, too. > > A bit in the direction of what NameSpacePlugin does, I guess, only just in > terms of tagging, rather than tiddler titles. > http://namespace.tiddlyspace.com > > For example, John could be the son of Jack. So instead of merely tagging > John with [[Jack]], it would semantically be more meaningful to have a > qualifier that allows to specify this tagging relation as... > > John <tagged> [[Jack]](is parent) > > ...and then later be able to leverage a qualifier like this further down > the road. Ideally, [[is parent]] would as well, optionally, be a tiddler > explaining the qualifier and how to use it. > > A tag could perhaps have multiple qualifiers, e.g. > > [[tag]](qualifier1|qualifier2) > > Qualifiers couls be semantic relations in the form of... > > * has value > * is assiged to > * is child of > * is dependency for > * is created by > * is initiated by > * is located at > * is owned by > * is part of > * etc... > > It could even make sense to standardise the most vital of these semantic > qualifiers in the core to have people adopt consistent use cases... makes > communication a whole lot easier. > > Cheers, Tobias. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
