One (really unsophisticated but quick!) way to find untagged tiddlers is to sort them by their tags:
<$list filter="[modifier[MYUSERNAME]sort[tags]]" > <$view field="title" format="link"/> <$view field="tags" /> </$list> cmari On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:33 PM, David Gifford <[email protected]> wrote: > I too would like to be able to quickly find untagged tiddlers, and was > going to suggest such a feature myself. > > Preferably there could be a way, either by a search filter or by pasting a > list widget, to see all tiddlers that do not have a tag. I think that would > be preferable to assigned a "uncategorized" tag to all untagged tiddlers > (would really make things like tag clouds look ugly) or adding yet another > tab to the already overloaded tabs in the sidebar. > > Dave > > > > > On Thursday, September 12, 2013 1:56:10 PM UTC-5, Tobias Beer wrote: >> >> Hi Helu, >> >> >>> Sometimes I forgot to tag some Tiddlers that I should have tagged and so >>> they kinda get lost in a sea of Tiddlers. >>> They are not in Missing (I know they shouldn't) and the All, Recent and >>> Orphans lists might be too large to search for this 'forgot-to-tag' >>> Tiddlers. >>> Automatically assigned default tag like 'Uncategorized' category could >>> be a solution. >>> >> >> I'm not much a fan of this. Actually what there should rather be is an >> [untagged] button in the tags list or the option to gather non-matching >> stuff as well and chuck it into a named category, e.g. <untagged>, i.e. >> when is[current] is undefined, the tagging[] filter should perhaps >> return all untagged tiddlers and then the tag button whose text is coming >> from <$view field="title" format="text" /> should return whatever has >> been defined using the mismatch parameter, e.g. *<untagged>* via some >> kind of pseudo-context. >> >> Anyhow, at some point there will be some <<newTiddler>> macro (or >> widget) as in classic Tiddlywiki and using that you'll be able to always >> tag stuff this or that way. >> >> Another feature I would like is to display Random Tiddler for random >>> check/discovery. >>> >> >> Yes, a [random[]] filter would be nice. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
