Hi Jeremy! Did you already post somewhere the list of proposals for the external link syntax? Did you see my last proposal?
internal: [[pretty|internal]] or [[internal]] external: [[pretty][external]] or [[][external]] This would mean that any external link would need an pretty part. If that part is empty, the pretty-part would be the link itself. But I don't think this should be a big problem. At least for me, every real external link has a pretty part anyway. But I think the http(s)?:// regular expression for links should be kept, so http://google.com/ would still be rendered as a link. So for http(s) links, no [[][http://...]]would be required. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
