Hi Stephan I haven't had a chance to collate all the suggestions from the hangout. Based on the discussion so far, I'm planning to implement:
[ext[index.html]] - explicit external link [[index.html]] - adaptive link that applies heuristics to the link text to determine if it is external or internal [in[index.html]] - explicit internal tiddler link It's the simplest suggestion, but I think also the easiest to type and the easiest to read. Best wishes Jeremy On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Stephan Hradek <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Jeremy! > > Did you already post somewhere the list of proposals for the external link > syntax? Did you see my last proposal? > > internal: > [[pretty|internal]] or [[internal]] > external: > [[pretty][external]] or [[][external]] > > This would mean that any external link would need an pretty part. If that > part is empty, the pretty-part would be the link itself. But I don't think > this should be a big problem. At least for me, every real external link has > a pretty part anyway. > > But I think the http(s)?:// regular expression for links should be kept, so > http://google.com/ > would still be rendered as a link. So for http(s) links, no [[][http:// > ...]] would be required. > > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
