On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:17:49 AM UTC+1, Mat wrote:
>
> ```` for monospace
>
``` ... only 3 of them
> ...am I alone in thinking that this is a bit much? It doesn't feel
> coherent. Even CSS would be more intuitive and generic ; ie {{block{ ...
> {{mono{ ...etc. So how about this idea, using the single and familiar > as
> a markup indicator
>
> >block
> here's the
> block text
> >block
>
hmmm ... nice idea, but imo you'll run into several problems if you want to
implement it.
I'm just naming a view.
a) There is no difference between the "start" and the "end" tag. So what
if, you need to nest them
eg:
>block
>block
here's the
block text
>block
>block
You'll need to implement a new syntax for your "nested tags" and your "end"
tag ... which introduces more complexity.
b) IMO typing ``` is much easier than >block >mono ... I'm lazy ... its
just less characters to type
```
mono text
```
>mono
mono text
>mono
imo the ">mono" tags interfere with the text in edit mode.
c) there may be some text eg: > linebreaks that should not indicate a """
block, but start a single line quote with the text "linebreak" ...
I did use a space to create a difference between ">linebreak" and ">
linebreak" ... As you can see, it is quite errorprone
...
So imo at the end there will be much more complexity and much more to type
:)
have fun!
mario
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
