On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Stephan Hradek <[email protected]>wrote:
> Besides the already introduced """ for literal linebreaks, what do think > about the idea of being able to dynamically define, on tiddler-level a > character to use for a linebreak? > > I have, at the moment, no idea whether or not this will work, but similar > to the \rules pragma we already have, we could create another like: > > \pragma linebreak # > > Which would then mean that any "#" character at the end of a line would > mean to take this linebreak literally and remove the hash. > > This is just a stupid idea, but maybe you like it? > It could also perhaps be done by switching in and out parse rules. The current paragraph parsing could be moved into a rule called "paragraphs" and the alternative newline-causes-<BR> rule called "linebreaks". The latter rule would be off by default. Then one would switch with: \rules +linebreaks -paragraphs (albeit with a newly invented syntax). Best wishes Jeremy. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
