On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 1:38:19 AM UTC+1, Daniel Baird wrote: > > > Naively it seems to me that when editing, the footnote content should be > right there where the reference is. This means you can easily edit the > note, and avoid hassles like orphaned notes when you copy/paste stuff, etc. > e.g: > > This is my sentence with [[note1::Sentences are usually more well > constructed than this one.]]. Another sentence follows. > > Even other paragraphs. > > _,~'^'~._referenceList^'~._,~'^ > > > Would give: > > This is my sentence with note1. Another sentence follows. > > Even other paragraphs. > > note1: Sentences are usually more well constructed than this one. > > When I read this suggestion I think about external [ext[]] and image [img[]] links. Thery are missing atm and some discussion is going on. So there is some work to do anyway.
eg: [footnote[note1|Sentences are usually more well constructed than this one.]] ... IMO there is a problem with the automatic numbering with this syntax. ... @jeremy what do you think? -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
