Hi Mark > Another thing about importing tiddlers -- they all get date-stamped with the date of the import
In my tests tiddlers that have a "modified" field are imported with that date - it's only tiddlers that don't have a "modified" field that get timestamped with the moment of import. Are you importing from a TWC file, or TW5? What browser and OS are you using? > About the conversion, what about adding a <br> tag after the newlines? That way the resulting Tiddler will look pretty much the same. As I said earlier: >> And the upgrade process needs to involve passing the text of the tiddler through a macro that massages the content - to begin with just doubling up the newlines would simplify the subsequent manual work. To be clear: the plan is to massage the tiddler text to help the upgrade from TWC to TW5, but that is not implemented yet. Best wishes Jeremy. On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Mark S. <[email protected]> wrote: > Another thing about importing tiddlers -- they all get date-stamped with > the date of the import. This means that all the information about when the > tiddler was last *deliberately *changed is lost. It would make more sense > if the modification date could be retained. > > Mark > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
