On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:24:40 AM UTC-8, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > > > Another thing about importing tiddlers -- they all get date-stamped > with the date of the import > > In my tests tiddlers that have a "modified" field are imported with that > date - it's only tiddlers that don't have a "modified" field that get > timestamped with the moment of import. Are you importing from a TWC file, > or TW5? What browser and OS are you using? > > Importing from TWC in FF 27 on windows XP.
> About the conversion, what about adding a <br> tag after the newlines? > That way the resulting Tiddler will look pretty much the same. > > As I said earlier: > > >> And the upgrade process needs to involve passing the text of the > tiddler through a macro that massages the content - to begin with just > doubling up the newlines would simplify the subsequent manual work. > > Doubling up the newlines sounds like spacing out the lines, which ends up with a result very different from the original. But I'm probably misunderstanding the intent. Thanks, Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
