> > *Your question about Cytoscape:* Yes its great I admit it, but I had to > make a choice. After comparing the APIs, I felt It doesn't focus on > graph-manipulation at runtime by the enduser (vis.js does this out of the > box). vis.js has many modes for calculating the motion of the graph when > beeing dragged, you can specify gravity and all the physics - cytoscape > doesn't have this. Also I liked that vis.js allows "dot" and "json" > notation to describe the graph (which is not really relevant here). > Cytoscape allows stuff like shortest path calculation and all that (which > is also not really relevant here). Both are great... as I said I had to > make a choice and in the end vis.js appeared more useful. > > Regards Felix >
Ok, I have to trust you since I did not make any comparison. What I don like about vis.js is one of the things you consider a "feature", the physics. I hate them. I want to place elements whatever I want, not where physics allows me. Will you give the option to deactivate them? I would like to see something like this: http://jsbin.com/gist/621d51ea7de19608127e?js,output -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
