Interesting and unexpected. If you don't mind, can I ask how this would play with the open source dev of TW? I mean, what if you or some skilled developers here 'code TW-stuff but that really also deals with or solves needs we have in TW (say, macros, widgets, interface issues or even applications... "photo gallery", "atom feeder", ...) - would these solutions then be proprietary outside of TW? Might such an endeavour actually hamper regular TW development?
Do you have an idea for TiddlyWiki content that you think people might pay > for? [...] This first step is simple: we create a framework for building > iOS apps that provide a terrific, read-only user experience for interacting > with TiddlyWiki documents. The specified restrictions make it sound like you already have something specific in mind for this stage - or are you asking if someone has an idea *and* that it fulfills this? (To which my answer is 'yes, of course I do', btw). > [...] hopfully we'd find a big enough handful of people that individual > shares of the startup costs would be relatively small. [...] I need to > know if there's anyone out there who might be prepared to put some money on > the table based on their belief that they have content that could viably > support this business model. > An alternative route might be to combine these two, i.e someone might have a great idea that others would be willing to help fund. Or is that what you mean (as opposed to many individuals funding their own ideas)? ...in a way a crowdfunding scheme... <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
