On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Tobias Beer wrote:
I imagined the rationale would be something like that. So, taking a look at *socialusers* for TiddlyWeb may prove to be the best approach to not start all from scratch.
Yes, likely.
I take it, *tank *implements its own authentication layer / workflow / processes / modules / forms, independent from or extending *socialusers*. So yes, wanting some form of user management sure does not necessarily mean wanting tank... but only those user-management-components when it comes to authentication, and possibly registration ...well, basic user management that works out-of-the-box-ish rather than after develop all of that from scratch.
tank's auth is a UI on top of https://github.com/cdent/tiddlywebplugins.oauth and https://pypi.python.org/pypi/tiddlywebplugins.magicuser -- Chris Dent http://burningchrome.com/ [...]
