Hi

Thanks for that -- nice piece of software! From there I found Slack 
<https://slack.com/> -- which looks to be a superior collaboration tool -- 
syncs nicely across all devices. I'll give both a try -- promising. I've 
been using Evernote, Pushbullet and Gitbook (synced with btsync), for this 
kind of thing. Might make a case for a change -- although I don't see 
WorkFlowy as a replacement for Evernote -- rather an additional tool. I'll 
have to see how they can work together.

I really like the way the WorkFlowy outliner works -- good case for 
someone(?) to write a plugin for TW which duplicates this functionality. 
The TW could be used offline then synced whenever a device goes online -- 
the CouchDB hosted version of TW was a move in this direction -- or perhaps 
syncing with Dropbox or btsync would be a better approach.

regards

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 11:05:10 PM UTC+2, David Gifford wrote:
>
> Thanks Matabele, 
>
> ...for introducing me to Cyborganize, which focused on BrainStormWFO, a 
> very nice tool. This set me to researching newer outlining tools. My 
> favorite, hands down, of the various tools I saw was workflowy.com. I 
> took some notes I had researched recently and in a very short amount of 
> time I organized them perfectly! Faster than I could have done in 
> TiddlyWiki. I love the interface and their way of doing things and 
> displaying them. TiddlyWiki is way better for finished articles, for my 
> website, and for productivity and work info. But I think I will probably 
> start using Workflowy for organizing my academic and personal notes. I am a 
> happy camper right now.
>
> Dave
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 1:40:02 AM UTC-5, Matabele wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> You might find the ideas from this site 
>> <http://www.cyborganize.org/clarity/what-is-cyborganize/> of interest. 
>> Essentially, WordPress blogs are used for journalling, and clips are then 
>> moved into TiddlyWiki as raw ideas require massaging into information. 
>>
>> I run my personal Wordpress journals in a docker.io 
>> <http://docs.docker.com/installation/mac/> container, but any LAMP setup 
>> will do the trick -- like this one for Windows: Windows Installer 
>> <http://www.microsoft.com/web/gallery/install.aspx?appid=WordPress>
>>
>> regards
>>
>> On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 3:57:03 AM UTC+2, David Gifford wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all, 
>>>
>>> One goal that is always eluded me is the idea of having one TiddlyWiki 
>>> file be a hub for all my notes, rather than spreading my notes out among 
>>> several TiddlyWiki files. Tagging and hyperlinking will always be limited 
>>> in application if one's ideas have to be spread out among different files. 
>>> I have sensed I am not the only one who has seen TiddlyWiki as a potential 
>>> route to a global personal information management tool. When node.js 
>>> appeared I mistakenly thought it would be the solution to the filesize 
>>> issue. But in practice it also slowed down with the inclusion of multiple 
>>> images, etc. 
>>>
>>> On my Recursos.giffmex.org, to keep file size to a minimum and increase 
>>> the speed at which files can be opened by site users, I am using a central 
>>> TiddlyWiki file that links to numerous static HTML files. I am using the 
>>> create static file from tiddler button found in the search area. This has 
>>> been a helpful process for me, but it has a drawback. If I want to edit a 
>>> static file, I must actually edit the tiddler in the originating file, then 
>>> create a replacement static file, and replace the old static file with it. 
>>>
>>> This is caused me to wonder if there could be such a thing as an html 
>>> file that could act like a tiddler only in the sense that it also has an 
>>> edit template, so that it could be edited in the same way a tiddler is 
>>> edited. That way the central TiddlyWiki could act as a hub with external 
>>> links to small, easily editable HTML files that act as articles or entries. 
>>>
>>> With such a system, a TiddlyWiki file could conceivably be a much more 
>>> extensible knowlege base, since each tiddler in the central file would be 
>>> small, only a hyperlink to the html file, plus any tags and internal 
>>> hyperlinks to related tiddlers. And the html files would be small, 
>>> basically the size of the static files I create now, plus the edit template 
>>> mechanism. 
>>>
>>> Of course, there would also be the need to quickly create such editable 
>>> files from within the TW file. 
>>>
>>> I am guessing that this is all just wishful thinking, but it doesn't 
>>> hurt to ask if this is in the realm of possibility, does it? Does this give 
>>> any of you developers some bright ideas? 
>>>
>>> Blessings, Dave 
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3c982134-7544-42b0-a963-c28895586d2f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to