Another option would be to use a "list" field to explicitly set the ordering that is to be used. This is particularly useful when dealing with Unicode characters since SORT sequences of various Unicode alphabets are often not the same as the positions of the characters =in their alphabets.
One of the benefits of dealing with Unicode characters is that there are about 100,000 defined Cidepoinys, the majority of which can be used as Tags and in Tiddler names (as sigils), which really improves information "density". Regards, Hans On Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 2:08:33 PM UTC-4, Jed Carty wrote: > > ... > I am leaning toward case insensitive because that is probably the closest > to what most people would expect from the operator. Any suggestions? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/786e6f2f-927b-4e2c-abaf-6f090b4aa87f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
