El miércoles, 26 de agosto de 2015, 8:26:08 (UTC+2), D John escribió: > > > But tiddly on iOS is a greater idea. It is a lot of fun for programmers to > RTFM and learn a new scripting language subset. > > [...] > > From a content creator's perspective, it is a handicap Tiddlywiki cannot > run Plain old javascript content. May be the Missing manual will > demonstrate the Tiddly-way of integrating interactive HTML content (d3.js, > createjs.js...) into Tiddlywiki wikis ? >
Can you see the non-sense situation those two sentences create? First you say that would be fun to learn a new language subset. And just two lines after you say that not being able to run plain JavaScript is a handicap. Really? Tw is one of the most permissive frameworks I saw. You can run as arbitrary JavaScript as you want as long as you wrap it on a plugin or on a macro. What do you mean with plain javascript? Objects? functions ? closures ? all that is available on tw. Or maybe you mean the JS from the ninety's where you do all those horrible document.innerHtml or onClick=alert() ? Have you tried to compare TW with any other framework? React native for example ? I started TW more than a year ago, and it was hard to start programming, but once you get the basics, is as easy as any "good old plain" JavaScript. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bb5f110d-70e7-4225-8aef-a96441652363%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
