WHY not just run another wiki where collaboration is permitted live?
DokuWiki is perfectly capable to do this. Can't we use a DokuWIki instance
till TiddlyWiki 5 is ready for collaboration?
Or is there a NIH (not invented here) problem with using a 'competing'
software?
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 22:32:25 UTC+5:30, Mat wrote:
>
> There is no equivalent for TW5 and the main problem is that we currently
> don't have the infrastructure to let community members collectively build
> up a TW, at least not in any practical way. This will probably be solved
> when we enable TiddlyWikis to interact ("the Federation") and
> fetch/assemble data from other TWs but this is not yet implemented.
>
> The closest thing we come to a community-info site is, I'm sad to say,
> this place i.e this google group.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/de9df96a-0f5e-4190-abbe-363f142854b5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
