On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 9:29:15 AM UTC+2, Leopold Bloom wrote: > > WHY not just run another wiki where collaboration is permitted live? > DokuWiki is perfectly capable to do this. Can't we use a DokuWIki instance > till TiddlyWiki 5 is ready for collaboration? >
First of all, anyone is more than welcome to set up anything. It seems the trickiest part is to get people to use/contribute to it - and, not least, to get people to refer to it. It has to gain traction. Or is there a NIH (not invented here) problem with using a 'competing' > software? I must admit that I personally do feel some dissonance to using other software for this. Not concerning the "competing" aspect but, dammit, we have a wiki software that itself really ought to be the perfect solution to what we need. ...it's not tho. But overall, no, I would not say it is a "NIH matter". Besides, googlegroups is NIH of course. I think, ironically, that people *mostly *feel this google group, coupled with the tw.com documentation, is *good enough *for getting the info they need. This lessens the "pressure" to get an alternative even if there is still a need. But again, the trickiest part seems to be to get people to participate in whatever collaborative solution is put up. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bcaefca2-24eb-419a-ba72-6a35fc19c708%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
