Hi Metabele, > Yes -- I prefer that option too -- I'll change the widget accordingly. > > Your proposal for the allbefore[] and allafter[] filters is a good one. > They now respond to the presence of a suffix -- this will cause the marker > to be included in the output list. In the docs, I shall specify that the > suffix should be 'include', but anything will do. >
Great stuff, taking off nicely the listop widgetry. Interesting that it hasn't been conceived of before. Writing to a tiddler based on the result of filter operations. Another thing that may be of need is a format parameter where you just don't want that single tiddler title that is left to be encoded via double square brackets but only as.is. Compare to: *#2035 parameter "format" for set widget* https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/pull/2035 But perhaps for the list-ops it is more clear that we are in-fact always operating on list fields... whereas with the set-widget we might just be abusing a filter to evaluate something. Best wishes, — tb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9fe7ef0a-2cff-40f7-95ca-4094af7dfa96%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
