On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 5:14:46 AM UTC+2, Richard Evans wrote: > > What I want to do is istead of replacing the item, I want to show it, I > could use a Tiddler to get the same functionality but then then each > Glossary term is in a separate Tiddler with all the overhaeds in > maintenance that entails and they are not all in one place. I could tag > them with a Glossary tag and collect them under one Tiddler. > IMO if you use TW for a longer time, you'll find out, that, if every term is a tiddler has much more advantages, than drawbacks. ... but this only time can tell :)
But I think it would be much simpler, to use the existing linking structure > and be able to go to a point in a Tiddler, and not just the Tiddler. > It's actually much much harder, since this is against the TW design priciple, where "everything is a tiddler". So accassing lists of tiddlers is easy, because TW knows about tiddlers but it doesn't know much about the tiddler content atm. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5133f084-9cee-415d-833a-422ca2ef7ed5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
