it IS odd. For TW type code you would EXPECT iteration.
will it? On Wednesday, 11 May 2016 22:51:50 UTC+2, Matthew Lauber wrote: > > I don't have a good solution. What I ended up doing was creating my own > plugin library on github, and then I only need to copy that tiddler to new > files. From there, I can install everything via the plugin library > mechanism. This had the added benefit that only any given tiddler, I can > check to see if I've updated any of the plugins easily, and easily install > the updates. But it doesn't help with other people's plugins unless I keep > up with copying and pasting them. > > Matt > > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 1:37:29 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: >> >> I do hold back slightly, but on this I kinda think its a thought, maybe >> others have thunk? >> >> That the best plugins one combines into ONE plugin to EASILY transport TW >> to TW. >> >> HOW can one do that? >> >> >> >> *Is there an ethic for it?*AND A METHOD? >> >> Josiah >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ed153e5b-405c-48b5-8da2-7e72f663fe2a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
