El lunes, 26 de septiembre de 2016, 21:30:55 (UTC+2), Jed Carty escribió: > > Mainly in the places where the low-powered computing aspects are relevant. > Some phones are low powered, but some others are pure beasts.
> That said I do think that the practice that I have seen pushed so hard by > many large tech companies of removing functionality form products because > it doesn't work on the current paradigm of mobile interface is short > sighted to the point of being actively harmful to the future by teaching a > generation of technology users that if you can't do something on a 5 inch > touch screen than you can't do it. > That vision is a bit limited. Limiting features of a product on a screen where they are literally unusable is not limiting the product, is limiting that product on that particular scenario. Those features would be available on larger screens. > I would like to add more to tiddlywiki to help create things that can be > easily used on a variety of screens. In my opinion the problem is that we > (as in developers/designers in general) haven't worked out rules for what > works and what doesn't yet. > Probably true > I want something that works as well on a mobile device as on a desktop, > but as long as the accepted way to do that is to cripple the desktop > version I am not going to be involved. > Valid point. But not being mobile first does not mean ignoring mobile totally. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/cf1236b3-fdd7-4de8-8a15-62630b5a7f81%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
