Hi Danielo,
> It may be simple, but it is not obvious neither consistent. Every piece of
> tiddlywiky works its own way, it's a bit of pain to remember all the moving
> parts. This is just one more piece on the puzzle
>From a perspective of modularity,
outsourcing exhaustive action code into discrete,
even reusable chunks is the right thing to do ...for me.
Overloading a widget attribute with heaps of wikitext,
now that's what I would call inconsistent when I look at it.
Sure that'll work, but from a developer's pov it's awful.
It's like writing mountains of js directly into some
onclick="javascrit:alert('foo');" handler.
Preferably, you just don't do that.
It's separation of concerns 101.
Best wishes,
Tobias.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d4210098-3b72-4a19-a0cb-d8b0769df0f3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
