Ciao Danielo & all On Friday, 23 Dec, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > *Maybe we should stick this thread to enhance visibility*
I very much agree that some threads deserve to get pinned here. Those that are of wide general developing importance. As far as I know there is no agreed way to do that. ANYONE KNOW HOW TO? It seems to me that when that does NOT happen a thread is more likely to disappear into the Usual Google Swamp. The current discussion & initiatives here, as well as other threads this one partly developed from, deserve marking in some way. They are a different KIND of discussion than normal ongoing ones. And the recent ones address the overall communication & "documentation" situation as is, I think, better than anything I seen before. They deserve notice so we don't have to go round this discussion again in the future. Given that Riz has also made a large initiative on "documentation" on Reddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/TiddlyWiki5/) I think its important to acknowledge and look at concrete options like that too, in addition to Stack Exchange/Overflow. It becomes hard to be fair in evaluation without knowing the options clearly. Google Groups is absolutely crap at contextualising things like this adequately. Pinning is the only mechanism I know of it it has that can approximate what is needed in order to provide that context. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d29ee80f-edc2-483d-a5cf-345f8230ff0e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
